Nathan Davis wins Icon's week 3 football contest
Nathan Davis is the winner of Week 3 of the Icon football contest, according to Corey Greer, contest judge. Davis, Melina Woods and Tater Hooker all correctly picked 11 games. Davis was declared the winner by virtue of the first tie-breaker.
Other contestants:
10 correct - Adelyn Althaus, Ben Reineke, Bill Edwards, David Glick, Jim Dillman, Nathan Lamb and Todd Fleharty.
9 correct - Barry Schneck, Brad Smith, Coral Lamb, Duane Bollenbacher, John Clevidence, John Dailey, Mark Delisle, Nathan Curtis, Randy Stewart, Rich Johnson and Seth Burkholder.
8 correct - Brandon Huber, Chris Boisvert, Dave Bracy, Isaac Little, Jared Lehman, John Schmutz, Luke Amstutz and Mark Sommers.
7 correct - Benji Bergstrand, Darin Moser, Matt Amstutz, Matt Oglesbee, Megan Morris, Nancy Armour, Randy Garmatter and Tom Clark.
6 correct - Angie Gray, Cheri Bracy, Denny Edinger, Don Luginbuhl, Jerry Cupples, Mandy LeVeck and Mary Glick.
5 correct - Brad Fruchey and Scoot Parkins.
4 correct - Mike Falk
Cumulative leaders, after two weeks are:
24 correct - Tater Hooker.
23 correct - Adelyn Althaus, Brad Smith, Nathan Davis and Todd Fleharty.
22 correct - David Glick.
21 correct - Ben Reineke, Duane Bollenbacher, Jim Dillman and Mark Delisle.
20 correct - Jared Lehman, Luke Amstutz, Matt Amstutz and Rich Johnson.
There are 51 other contestants with less than 20 correct picks accumulated.
Weekly winners:
Week 1 - Mark Wolke
Week 2 - Brad Smith
Week 3 - Nathan Davis
Stories Posted This Week
Saturday, January 11, 2025
Friday, January 10, 2025
Thursday, January 9, 2025
Wednesday, January 8, 2025
- Dennis G. Marquart worked at Bluffton Community Hospital
- Obituary for Marjorie Janice Thomas
- Pirate girls basketball defeats Shawnee
- Rockets boys basketball loses to Miller City
- Planning Commission sees first draft of proposed triplex development
- McDonald joins Pandora branch of First National Bank
- Chamber gives "A Major Award" to Samuel W. Diller Co. law offices
- Question for the Icon: Is there a fee for this?